The debate about ingestion vs injection often comes up, and I put together a rebuttal to the following article:
This article explained: Formaldehyde: For the author to state that formaldehyde is harmless is an outright lie. It is toxic to human tissues via any route of administration. "The injection of formalin into the muscles produces myositis.": Aluminum: "The scientific literature on the adverse health effects of Al is extensive. Health risk assessments for Al must take into account individual co-factors (e.g., age, renal function, diet, gastric pH)." It travels straight to the brain: The CDC admits they have not studied it! Only when the GI barrier is bypassed, such as by intravenous infusion or in the presence of advanced renal dysfunction, does aluminum have the potential to accumulate. As an example, with intravenously infused aluminum, 40% is retained in adults and up to 75% is retained in neonates. Aluminum administration and its effects ~ Provides an "immunostimulatory effect". This can logically be exacerbated in sensitive individuals - but you wouldn't know if your infant was considered "sensitive" until they were injected. "Inflammation induced at the injection site", "The maximum amount of aluminum adjuvant allowed in human vaccines in the US is 0.85 mg Al/dose, and the amount in licensed vaccines ranges from 0.125 to 0.85 mg Al/dose". THIS is exactly why vaccines should be separated, if not avoided completely. When multiple vaccines are given, the odds of exceeding the maximum allowable amount of Aluminum increases greatly. MSG: Actually, it is not safe for everyone! Medical journals contain research on MSG's effect of inducing depressive behaviors, Reduced cortisol effects are shown in treated lab animals. On antigens ~ They may be injected in microscopic amounts, and they may be "needed" to stimulate an immunologic response so that a parent can feel that they've taken "proper protective measures", but that is NOT the end of the story. No one realized their child had a peanut allergy until their child first ingested a peanut, so we need to afford the same allowances to parents questioning vaccines. We haven't yet created a confident method of pre-determining how a child will respond to vaccine antigens, which puts them at enormous risk. Again, the author contradicts her statement that there is no difference between ingestion and injection. She states, "Drinking snake venom is absolutely not the same as being injected with it. The gut will break down the venom in the same way it digests proteins in food, rendering it useless. If you consumed it, it would not hit the bloodstream in original active and potent form. If a snake bites you, there is nothing underneath your skin or in your muscle to neutralize the venom. It is not broken down so it is able to travel quickly to your lymph glands reach the blood stream and from there it can quickly get to your nervous system and heart." This is precisely why injected vaccines pose such a danger. The toxic nano particles can travel quickly to your lymph glands, reach the blood stream and from there it can quickly get to your nervous system and heart." (And a child's developing brain). Next, she claims, "The antigens in a vaccine are only mildly active – they’re either dead or damaged. They are active enough to cause an immune response, but not potent enough to cause harm." We know that we are all individuals, and you can't confidently know beforehand if the immune response you hope to stimulate in your child might be exaggerated in their tiny body. An over-stimulated response results in any one of the countless auto-immune disorders running rampant in today's generation. You can't generalize pharmaceutical products and say they are safe nor will they produce identical results for everyone, because you cannot know know how every individual will react. Oral polio vaccine facts: The majority of polio cases in our current world are oral polio vaccine-induced. It is important to know polio history and the deception that surrounds it. Myth #1: Vaccines definitely DO "bypass" the body's initial defense systems. Yes, insect stings and thorn pricks break the surface of the skin, but they are not the natural way to contract any respiratory illness - that is why they fall into the category of respiratory illnesses. Myth 2: “70–80 % of the body’s immune system is situated in the gut, therefore nature intends for pathogens to enter only this way”. "...This is faulty thinking. Immunity acquired via the gut is not superior." Well, according to Kathy, apparently we were created with a major flaw then - actually, two. Our mucosal barriers are unnecessary, and we should have had portals all over our skin that allow infection to sneak in. She is committed to her belief that a man-made method of giving someone an illness is the best way. You can doubt that we were created properly, you can contemplate that for a bit, then check this out from the National Institute of Health. Argue all you want, Miss Kathy. By breaking through the skin and injecting poisonous substances, you are indeed "bypassing" all other natural defenses. "Myth 3: Vaccines overstimulate one part of the immune system" Medical professionals are researching and reporting on this very issue, so you cannot say it is a "myth": "Vaccines, in several reports were found to be temporally followed by a new onset of autoimmune diseases." Ask yourself this: Does this make vaccines look risk-free for patients with compromised immune systems? More evidence that ingestion and injection are not equal: Injected mercury causes more damage than ingested Hg Among recorded cases are one individual who experienced seizures for 6 months following Mercury injection "Subcutaneous mercury injection should be managed with local wound debridement, whereas ingestions are rarely of clinical significance." "Mercury is a complex toxin with clinical manifestations determined by the chemical form, route, dose, and acuity of exposure." Bodily absorption and subsequent effects are significantly faster with an injection than oral administration. "In 11 studies reserpine was given by mouth for fourteen to one hundred and four days...Severe hyperthyroidism was converted to mild disease after two to four weeks of treatment. Ten patients were given large intramuscular doses of reserpine. Marked improvement...occurred within hours; maximum improvement was achieved in twenty-four to seventy-two hours." The AUC (area under the curve) represents the total drug exposure over time, where we can easily spot a stark difference between oral ingestion and needle injection. When studying the effects of mineral treatment in adult men, "The AUC after oral administration is [a mere] 26% of that after i.v., or i.m. (Intramuscular) administration." Doctors and researchers have done studies and more studies which show that an intravenous or intramuscular route produces a greater effect of any substance than an oral route. Methylation explained: Injected aluminum is meant to remain in your body, causing harm we cannot truly know.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
October 2016
Categories |